Scan to download
BTC $76,706.02 -1.19%
ETH $2,279.58 -1.69%
BNB $623.36 -0.47%
XRP $1.39 -1.82%
SOL $83.85 -1.93%
TRX $0.3237 +0.09%
DOGE $0.0995 +1.78%
ADA $0.2465 -0.31%
BCH $445.98 -0.33%
LINK $9.23 -0.95%
HYPE $40.46 -4.68%
AAVE $97.25 +1.37%
SUI $0.9219 -0.51%
XLM $0.1645 -2.07%
ZEC $337.22 -5.47%
BTC $76,706.02 -1.19%
ETH $2,279.58 -1.69%
BNB $623.36 -0.47%
XRP $1.39 -1.82%
SOL $83.85 -1.93%
TRX $0.3237 +0.09%
DOGE $0.0995 +1.78%
ADA $0.2465 -0.31%
BCH $445.98 -0.33%
LINK $9.23 -0.95%
HYPE $40.46 -4.68%
AAVE $97.25 +1.37%
SUI $0.9219 -0.51%
XLM $0.1645 -2.07%
ZEC $337.22 -5.47%

Cosine: The large asset security management model needs a major upgrade, and details on why the Safe front-end was tampered with still need to be disclosed

2025-02-27 00:48:56
Collection

ChainCatcher message, Slow Mist Yu Xian posted on platform X stating that Safe has ultimately been breached. The smart contract part is indeed fine (easily verifiable on-chain), but the front end was tampered with and forged to achieve a deceptive effect.

As for why it was tampered with, we will wait for the official details from Safe. Safe can be considered a type of security infrastructure; theoretically, anyone using this multi-signature wallet could be stolen from, similar to Bybit. All other services with front ends, APIs, and user interaction may carry this risk as well. This is also a classic supply chain attack, and the security management model for large/huge assets needs a significant upgrade.

app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.