Scan to download
BTC $78,074.70 -0.04%
ETH $2,322.59 -1.13%
BNB $628.04 -0.74%
XRP $1.41 -1.34%
SOL $85.52 -1.03%
TRX $0.3262 +0.79%
DOGE $0.0990 +0.25%
ADA $0.2482 -1.82%
BCH $454.74 +0.57%
LINK $9.35 -1.37%
HYPE $42.84 +3.89%
AAVE $98.95 +3.46%
SUI $0.9382 -0.96%
XLM $0.1679 -2.20%
ZEC $360.52 +1.55%
BTC $78,074.70 -0.04%
ETH $2,322.59 -1.13%
BNB $628.04 -0.74%
XRP $1.41 -1.34%
SOL $85.52 -1.03%
TRX $0.3262 +0.79%
DOGE $0.0990 +0.25%
ADA $0.2482 -1.82%
BCH $454.74 +0.57%
LINK $9.35 -1.37%
HYPE $42.84 +3.89%
AAVE $98.95 +3.46%
SUI $0.9382 -0.96%
XLM $0.1679 -2.20%
ZEC $360.52 +1.55%

issuance

first_img HK Web3 Feastival Roundtable: From Wall Street to Blockchain, the Practical Logic and Future Vision of Global RWA Issuance

ChainCatcher reported live that Li Baiwei, Partner at HashKey Tokenisation, John Cahill, Chief Operating Officer of Galaxy Digital Asia, Abdelhamid Bizid, Managing Director of BlackRock, and Min Lin, Managing Director and Head of Global Business Development at Ondo Finance, attended the HK Web3 Feastival roundtable to share insights on "From Wall Street to Blockchain: The Practical Logic and Future Landscape of Global RWA Issuance."The attendees generally agreed that the core value of RWA and asset tokenization is no longer just an innovative narrative at the conceptual level, but a realistic path for upgrading financial market infrastructure. John Cahill stated that blockchain is essentially a superior "underlying pipeline" for financial markets, and in the long run, the ultimate goal of financial markets will be "tokenization of everything"; what truly needs attention is not whether tokenization will happen, but whether market participants have already begun preparing for this endgame.Abdelhamid Bizid pointed out that from the perspective of traditional asset management institutions, the current tokenized products primarily serve clients who do not wish to move funds out of the on-chain ecosystem but want to achieve stable returns and compliant asset allocation tools. BlackRock has seen a clear demand for on-chain yield products and will continue to launch more new products. However, he also emphasized that the real bottleneck in the industry at this stage is not technology, but rather institutional adoption, demand validation, liquidity depth, regulatory clarity, and non-technical barriers such as costs and taxation.Min Lin, drawing from Ondo's practice, stated that the key to tokenized stocks is not just moving U.S. stocks onto the blockchain, but transforming stocks that are originally static in brokerage accounts into programmable financial instruments that can serve as collateral, margin, and lending assets in DeFi, further unlocking capital efficiency. He mentioned that the main demand currently observed by Ondo still comes from retail and crypto-native funds in regions like Asia, Southeast Asia, and Latin America, which find it difficult to directly access the U.S. stock market. This indicates that tokenized stocks at this stage are more like "global asset access tools" rather than mainstream trading venues for institutional funds.

first_img HK Web3 Feastival Roundtable: From "Asset Registration" to "On-chain Issuance", Bridging the Last Mile of RWA Cross-border Compliance

ChainCatcher reported live that Tang Bo, Assistant Dean of the Financial Research Institute at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Fei Si, Partner at King & Wood Mallesons, Diao Zhi Hai, Head of International Wealth Management at China International Capital Corporation, and Gavin Wang, Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer of SNZ Holding & SNZ Capital, jointly attended the HK Web3 Feastival roundtable discussion, sharing insights on "from asset registration" to "on-chain issuance," bridging the last mile of RWA cross-border compliance.Fei Si pointed out that the so-called "from asset registration to on-chain issuance" essentially establishes a replicable, sustainable, and legally compliant channel for "domestic assets, overseas issuance." He believes that the most critical aspect at this stage is to first establish a solid transaction structure and top-level product design, clarifying whether the product is classified as equity or debt, as this will directly determine the corresponding regulatory authorities, communication methods, and subsequent legal document arrangements.Diao Zhi Hai approached the issue from the practical perspective of traditional financial institutions, stating that the biggest challenge currently is not a single isolated pain point, but how to systematically connect multiple compliance nodes to form a truly implementable closed-loop mechanism. He indicated that RWA cross-border projects involve not only financial regulation but also data cross-border, cybersecurity, foreign exchange management, and other departmental collaborations. Therefore, it is essential to examine whether the underlying assets can be clearly defined and mapped on-chain, who qualifies as the issuer and controlling entity, and whether the non-financial regulatory requirements throughout the process have been incorporated into the plan.Gavin Wang entered the discussion from the investment and market demand perspective, emphasizing that the global trend of asset tokenization is certain, and that high-quality Chinese assets are still significantly undervalued overseas. This means that as long as the cross-border compliance path is opened, market demand genuinely exists. He believes that investment institutions are most concerned with whether the entire project has clear compliance boundaries and marketability: red lines cannot be crossed, and gray areas must be approached with caution. What is truly worth investing in are those asset types with clearer regulatory expectations that investors can more easily understand and accept. In the long term, he is optimistic about two types of Chinese cross-border RWA targets: one type is large, high-quality Chinese assets that are easily understood by overseas investors, and the other type includes high-end manufacturing, robotics, AI, and pharmaceutical pipelines that are still undervalued overseas but possess global competitiveness.

TeraWulf's $900 million share issuance settles today, CleanSpark mined 658 BTC in March, increasing its holdings to 13,561 BTC

According to BBX data, yesterday the capital operations and hash rate data of mining companies were concentrated, with the following core dynamics:TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ: $WULF) announced on April 14 via GlobeNewswire that it has completed the pricing of a $900 million public common stock offering, raised from the initially planned $800 million, issuing 47,400,000 shares at a price of $19.00 per share, with underwriters holding an additional 30-day over-allotment option (up to 7,110,000 shares); this offering is expected to close today (April 16). The funds raised will primarily be used for the construction of the Hawesville AI data center campus in Kentucky and to repay bridge credit facilities.CleanSpark, Inc. (NASDAQ: $CLSK) released its March operational report on April 7 (data as of March 31), reporting the mining of 658 BTC in March, with an average daily output of approximately 21.24 BTC, a peak hash rate of 50.0 EH/s, and an average monthly hash rate of about 47.3 EH/s (an increase of 11% month-over-month); as of the end of March, the company's total BTC holdings were 13,561 BTC, with a cumulative output of 1,799 BTC since the beginning of 2026; the average selling price of BTC in March was approximately $71,396. The company has signed contracts for 1.8 gigawatts of power capacity, and CEO Matt Schultz stated that the company is actively advancing the signing of its first AI/HPC large-scale customer contract.

Chen Weimin: The schedule for the issuance of the second batch of licenses has not yet been determined, and the total number of future licenses will be very limited

According to Tencent News' "Periscope," the Vice President of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, Chen Weimin, stated that the timeline for issuing the second batch of licenses has not yet been determined, as it needs to be "based on the operational situation of the first two companies," and the total number of licenses in the future will be very limited.In addition, sources revealed that Chinese institutions that participated in the application submission have received "window guidance" from relevant departments, requesting them to postpone their participation in the stablecoin license application. However, some Chinese institutions have continued to communicate with the Hong Kong Monetary Authority over the past few months. After excluding Chinese institutions, the vast majority of the proposed applicants have limited capabilities, and there are not many qualified institutions that can fully meet the requirements of the "Stablecoin Regulation."Lee Kuan-hong, the head of HSBC Payme, told reporters that any Payme user can open a stablecoin account. In the stablecoin account, users can directly transfer money to friends and family, transfer to merchants, or invest in products linked to stablecoins. Users in the HSBC app cannot directly open an account; they must wait for HSBC to screen eligible users before applying for a stablecoin account.Payme account opening has required users to be local residents of Hong Kong, while users of the HSBC app also include mainland users. Under the existing management framework in Hong Kong, only local residents can participate in virtual asset trading, and mainland customers, even if they are mobile payment users of HSBC Hong Kong, cannot apply for a stablecoin account.

OpenSea announced the postponement of the SEA token issuance, and the new issuance date has not yet been announced

OpenSea CEO Devin Finzer posted, "Latest update on SEA: The team has been pushing forward with development at full speed, with the initial plan to launch the first step during the event on March 30, but the OpenSea Foundation has decided to postpone the timeline. The reality is that the entire crypto market environment is currently quite challenging, and SEA will only be issued once. We can either force the release according to the original plan or ensure that all aspects are fully prepared so that this release lives up to the community's expectations. The following measures will be taken:No new reward waves will be conducted; the current reward wave will be the last round. Refund of platform fees is optional: Given our initial commitment to launch in Q1, we will offer a refund of platform fees (only for the portion we collected) to users participating in reward waves 3--6. If a refund is chosen, the Treasures rewards obtained during the corresponding period will be removed from the account. If a refund is claimed along with the Treasure Chest rewards, it essentially means that the transaction fees during this period will be borne by us. The specific process will be announced later.Existing Treasures remain valid: If users continue to hold Treasures, the foundation's previous commitment remains valid: they will be an important reference at TGE. This is independent of the token distribution from historical events. Starting March 31, OpenSea will reduce platform token trading fees to 0% for 60 days. After 60 days, we will introduce a new fee structure that makes fees more competitive for long-term trading users. Last year, we announced plans too early, leading to unnecessary uncertainty in the market. Therefore, when the foundation announces a new timeline, it will be clearer and more cautious."
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.