Scan to download
BTC $77,747.35 -0.33%
ETH $2,316.15 -0.71%
BNB $626.54 -0.79%
XRP $1.41 -1.01%
SOL $85.08 -1.33%
TRX $0.3252 +0.56%
DOGE $0.0982 -0.48%
ADA $0.2472 -2.36%
BCH $448.45 -0.86%
LINK $9.32 -1.61%
HYPE $42.16 +2.47%
AAVE $95.95 +0.37%
SUI $0.9285 -1.90%
XLM $0.1671 -2.74%
ZEC $359.29 +2.41%
BTC $77,747.35 -0.33%
ETH $2,316.15 -0.71%
BNB $626.54 -0.79%
XRP $1.41 -1.01%
SOL $85.08 -1.33%
TRX $0.3252 +0.56%
DOGE $0.0982 -0.48%
ADA $0.2472 -2.36%
BCH $448.45 -0.86%
LINK $9.32 -1.61%
HYPE $42.16 +2.47%
AAVE $95.95 +0.37%
SUI $0.9285 -1.90%
XLM $0.1671 -2.74%
ZEC $359.29 +2.41%

leverage

first_img Chief Economist of New Fire Group, Fu Peng: The essence of Bitcoin perpetual contracts is that large holders earn rent from long-term positions, while retail investors pay for leverage to go long

The newly appointed chief economist of New Fire Group, Fu Peng, stated on Twitter that the underlying business model of Bitcoin perpetual contracts is essentially the same as the "rollover fee/overnight fee" in traditional finance's gold and industrial commodity spot exchanges.Fu Peng pointed out that back in the day, gold exchanges settled through daily forced liquidation, with longs and shorts paying each other rollover fees. When retail investors held a large number of high-leverage long positions, the rollover fee became the most stable and hidden source of income for the platform. Nowadays, Bitcoin spot platforms mainly rely on perpetual contracts, with both sides settling the funding rate every 8 hours. When longs dominate, retail investors holding long positions continuously pay funding rates to shorts.Although the platform does not directly collect this fee, it significantly enhances trading activity, open interest, and liquidity, indirectly generating a large amount of fee income and forming a stable and substantial cash flow. Essentially, it is a business model where large players/institutions "collect rent" from long-term holdings, retail investors pay for leverage to go long, and the platform indirectly takes a cut.

Spark: The delisting of rsETH assets in January had caused strong dissatisfaction among ETH leveraged users, but it has now been proven to be a prudent strategy

The head of the Spark Protocol strategy, monetsupply.eth, posted on platform X stating that in January of this year, low-usage assets like rsETH were removed and collateral and functionality were continuously tightened. This move sparked strong dissatisfaction among "ETH leveraged" users at the time.Additionally, Spark has long set a high upper limit on interest rates in the ETH lending market, transferring some business and revenue to Aave over the past year (where its ETH borrowing rate once dropped to 10% or below). However, in the current market crisis environment, this strategy has proven to be more prudent. Currently, SparkLend still maintains sufficient ETH withdrawal liquidity, while Aave has experienced liquidity tightness and even "lock-up" situations in the Ethereum mainnet and multi-chain markets like Arbitrum and Base.monetsupply.eth further warned that since ETH is the core collateral asset, when market utilization reaches 100%, collateral liquidation will not be able to execute normally. The depletion of liquidity not only affects the depositor experience but may also pose systemic risks. In the current situation of insufficient liquidity in Aave, a 15%-20% drop in ETH prices could lead to significant bad debt accumulation (in addition to the potential impact of the rsETH incident).
app_icon
ChainCatcher Building the Web3 world with innovations.